| PCEP Journal article archive | Search |
| 2006 - Volume 5, Issue 4 |
|
Being-with and being-counter: Relational depth: the challenge of fully meeting the client Mearns, D., Schmid, P.F. - University of Strathclyde, GlasgowArticle | From volume/issue: 5.4 | Pages: 255–265 Keywords: person-centered therapy, relational depth, encounter, confrontation, dialogue, developmental agenda, existential touchstones Abstract: Following on from a previous publication (Schmid & Mearns, 2006), this paper continues the authors’ investigation of the relationship emphasis within person-centered therapy. It explores the concept of relational depth (Mearns & Cooper, 2005), especially in regard to work with hard-to-reach clients, outlining the particular challenges to the therapist seeking to engage the different parts of the client, even those in self-protective conflict with the therapeutic process. The ethical boundaries of therapeutic confrontation and dialogue that constitute relational depth are explored as is the developmental agenda for the therapist. |
Book reviewBinder, U.Review | From volume/issue: 5.4 | Pages: |
|
Carl Rogers: Lessons for working at relational depth. O'Leary, C.Article | From volume/issue: 5.4 | Pages: 229-239 Keywords: relational depth, congruence, commitment, confidence, imagination generosity Abstract: This paper, based on personal recollections and Carl Rogers’ written response to Reinhold Niebuhr and his dialogues with Martin Buber and B. F. Skinner, highlights five qualities of Carl Rogers that may encourage and inspire therapists. Congruence, commitment, confidence, imagination and generosity were characteristic of Rogers. Examples of these virtues from Rogers’ writing and history may provide a partial answer to Mearns and Cooper’s question: “What is it like to meet another human at relational depth?” (2005, p. 35). |
|
Letting go: The client’s experience of relational depth McMillan, M., McLeod, J. - University of Abertay Dundee, ScotlandArticle | From volume/issue: 5.4 | Pages: 277–292 Keywords: client experience, grounded theory, relational depth, qualitative research Abstract: The concept of relational depth represents a significant development within counseling and psychotherapy theory and practice. However, until now, comparatively little attention has been given to the distinctive perspective of the client in relation to this process. The aim of the present study was to explore the point of view of clients around their experiences of relational depth within psychotherapy. Ten participants were interviewed, each of whom had undergone multiple episodes of therapy. Data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. The account of relational depth generated by these clients suggested that deeply facilitative therapy relationships are characterized by a willingness to “let go” on the part of the client, and enter into an enduring relationship with their therapist. Clients’ descriptions disclosed aspects of relational connectedness that may often be hidden from practitioners. The implications of these findings for the theory of relational depth, and for the practice of counseling and psychotherapy, are discussed. |
Elliott, R., Mearns, D., Schmid, P.F., Stiles, W.B.Editorial | From volume/issue: 5.4 | Pages: |
|
Obituary : C. H. Patterson, 1912-2006 Obituary | From volume/issue: 5.4 | Pages: |
|
Supervising the humanity of the therapist Lambers, E. - ScotlandArticle | From volume/issue: 5.4 | Pages: 266–276 Keywords: relational depth, supervision, congruence, humanity Abstract: This paper gives an overview of a perspective on supervision as it has developed in relation to person-centered and experiential therapy and it explores supervision as a facilitative relationship focused on the development and maintenance of the counselor’s ability to relate congruently and at depth with clients. Working at relational depth in the supervision relationship enables the supervisee to go to particular depth with their own experiencing, enabling them to become more fully integrated, fully present and free to the total person of the client. |
|
The challenge of the Other: Towards dialogical person-centered psychotherapy and counseling Schmid, P.F. - Sigmund Freud University, Vienna Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center, San Francisco Institute for Person-Centered Studies, ViennaArticle | From volume/issue: 5.4 | Pages: 240–254 Keywords: dialogue, alterity, epistemology of transcendence, Thou-I relationship, intersubjectivity, encounter, co-presence Abstract: How can we understand an other person? If we try to understand the other person from one’s own perspective we finally end up at something we know already (this is termed “epistemology of the same”). The opposite way is to be receptive to what the other shows and wants to be understood (constituting a Thou–I relationship and an “epistemology of transcendence”). This is possible only when acknowledging both the fundamental commonality (“We”) and the fundamental alterity (“Other”). For the person-centered therapist this means facing the challenge of the otherness of the Other, to be called to respond existentially to the existential disclosure of a person in the very moment of meeting. A phenomenological exploration of intersubjectivity in therapy leads to a “pro-vocative” understanding of dialogue as primary occurrence. Dialogue is not a consequence but an — essentially asymmetric — precondition of a person to person or encounter relationship. The task is to realize the dialogical quality in the relationship to each client as the constitutive basis for psychotherapy. |
| Powered by Sigsiu.NET | ![]() |


